APAKAH RELIGIUSITAS KEISLAMAN MEMPENGARUHI KETIMPANGAN PENDAPATAN? BUKTI DATA PANEL DARI PROVINSI ACEH

  • Khairul Amri Universitas Islam Negeri Ar-raniry, Banda Aceh
  • A. Rahmat Adi
DOI: https://doi.org/10.14203/JEP.29.2.2021.147-166
Keywords: Islamic religiosity, Income Inequality, Panel Regression, Granger causality test

Abstract

Penelitian ini menganalisis pengaruh religiusitas keislaman terhadap distribusi pendapatan. Religiusitas diproksikan dengan tiga indikator pengukuran, yaitu jumlah masjid, pesantren, dan santri. Menggunakan dataset panel 23 kabupaten/kota di Aceh dari tahun 2010 hingga 2017, model analisis data yang digunakan adalah regresi panel metode fixed-effect. Hasil penelitian menemukan bahwa pesantren dan santri berpengaruh positif terhadap ketimpangan pendapatan. Sebaliknya, keberadaan masjid tidak mempengaruhi ketimpangan pendapatan. Hasil uji kausalitas Granger memberikan informasi statistik kausalitas satu arah dari ketimpangan pendapatan ke masjid dan pesantren dan dari masjid dan santri ke pesantren. Namun, tidak ada kausalitas dari ketiga dimensi religiusitas keislaman terhadap ketimpangan pendapatan. Informasi statistik ini menunjukkan bahwa, dalam jangka pendek, perubahan religiusitas Islam di Aceh merupakan respons terhadap perubahan ketimpangan pendapatan. Di sisi lain, ketimpangan pendapatan tidak merespon perubahan religiusitas keislaman.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abu Raiya, H., Pargament, K. I., Mahoney, A., & Stein, C. (2008). A psychological measure of islamic religiousness: Development and evidence for reliability and validity. The International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 18(4), 291–315. doi:10.1080/10508610802229270.
Aji, H. M. (2018). The effect of knowledge about halal and Islamic religiosity on attitude toward halal label, Conference on Islamic Management, Accounting, and Economics (CIMAE) Proceeding. 1, 1-8
Amalia, N., Moeis, J. P., Arundina, T., Pertiwi, R. H., & Mardhatillah, A. (2021). Impact analysis of religiosity and altruism on multidimensional inequality. International Review of Economics and Finance, 71, 517–525.
Basedau, M., Gobien, S., & Prediger, S. (2018). The multidimensional effects of religion on socioeconomic development: A review of the empirical literature. Journal of Economic Surveys, 32(4), 1106–1133. doi:10.1111/joes.12250
Becker, S. O., & Woessmann, L. (2013). Not the opium of the people: Income and secularization in a panel of Prussian counties. American Economic Review, Papers and Proceedings, 103(3), 539–544.
Cerniauskas, N., & Ciginas, A (2020) Measurement and decomposition of Lithuania's income inequality, Baltic Journal of Economics, 20(2), 139-169, DOI: 10.1080/1406099X.2020.1780693
Dincer, O. C., & Hotard, M. J. (2011). Ethnic and religious diversity and income inequality. Eastern Economic Journal, 37(3), 417–430. doi:10.1057/eej.2010.58
Dagum, C. (2014). Income Inequality Measures. Wiley StatsRef: Statistics Reference Online. doi:10.1002/9781118445112.stat03471
Dumitrescu, E.-I, & Hurlin, C. (2012). Testing for Granger non causality in heterogeneous panels, Economic Modelling 29,1450-1460.
Dutt, P., & Tsetlin, I. (2020). Income distribution and economic development: Insights from machine learning. Economics & Politics. doi:10.1111/ecpo.12157
Elgin, C., Goksel, T., Gurdal, M. Y., & Orman, C. (2013). Religion, income inequality, and the size of the government, Economic Modelling, 30, 225-234.
Franck, R., & Iannaccone, L. (2014). Religious decline in the 20th century West: Testing alternative explanations. Public Choice, 159(3/4), 385-414.
Gaskins, B., Golder, B., & Siegel, D. A. (2013). Religious Participation and Economic Conservatism, American Journal of Political Science, 57(4), 823–840. DOI: 10.1111/ajps.12024.
Gastwirth, J. L. (2017). Is the Gini Index of Inequality Overly Sensitive to Changes in the Middle of the Income Distribution? Statistics and Public Policy, 4(1), 1–11. doi:10.1080/2330443x.2017.1360813
Herzer, D., & Strulik, H. (2016). Religiosity and income: a panel cointegration and causality analysis. Applied Economics, 49(30), 2922–2938. doi:10.1080/00036846.2016.1251562
Himes, K. R. (2019). Catholic Social Teaching, Economic Inequality, and American Society. Journal of Religious Ethics, 47(2), 283–310. doi:10.1111/jore.12268
Jana-Masri, A., & Priester, P. E. (2007). The Development and Validation of a Qur’an-Based Instrument to Assess Islamic Religiosity: The Religiosity of Islam Scale. Journal of Muslim Mental Health, 2(2), 177–188. doi:10.1080/15564900701624436
Keister, L. A., & Eagle, D. (2016). Religion and inequality: the role of status attainment and social balance processes, Social Thought and Research, 33, 141-171.
Kochuthara, S. (2017). Economic Inequality: An Ethical Response. Religions, 8(8), 141. doi:10.3390/rel8080141.
Lam, K., & Mansouri, F. (2020). Beyond (mis)-recognition: Muslim youth and religiosity in Australia. Journal of Youth Studies, 1–16. doi:10.1080/13676261.2020.1766667.
Lipford, J. W., & Tollison, R. D. (2003). Religious Participation and Income. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 51(2), 249–260. doi:10.1016/S0167-2681 (02)00096-3.
Lopez, L., & Weber, S. (2017). Testing for Granger causality in panel data, The Stata Journal, 17(4), 927-984.
Makros, J., & McCabe, M. (2003). The relationship between religion, spirituality, psychological adjustment, and quality of life among people with multiple sclerosis. Journal of Religion and Health, 42(2), 143–159. doi:10.1023/A:1023681830716
Matteo, L. D. (2015). All equal in the sight of God: Economic inequality and religion in the early twentieth century, European Review of Economic History, 20, 23-45.
McCleary, R. M., & Barro, R. J. (2006). Religion and economy, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 20(2), 49–72.
McRorie, C. (2019). Heterodox Economics, Social Ethics, and Inequalities. Journal of Religious Ethics, 47(2), 232–258. doi:10.1111/jore.12263
Muliadi, & Amri, K. (2019). Infrastruktur jalan, belanja modal dan kesempatan kerja: Bukti data panel kabupaten kota di Aceh, Jurnal Manajemen dan Sains, 4(2), 334-341.
Müller, T. S., De Graaf, N. D., & Schmidt, P. (2014). Which societies provide a strong religious socialization context? Explanations beyond the effects of national religiosity. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 53(4), 739–759. doi:10.1111/jssr.12147
Musa, A. (2015). Spiritual Beliefs and Practices, Religiosity, and Spiritual Well-Being Among Jordanian Arab Muslim University Students in Jordan. Journal of Spirituality in Mental Health, 17(1), 34–49. doi:10.1080/19349637.2014.957609.
Naveed, A., & Wang, C. (2017). Can religion explain cross-country differences in inequality? A global perspective. Social Choice and Welfare, 50(3), 481–518. doi:10.1007/s00355-017-1093-1.
Norris, P., & Inglehart, R. (2004). Sacred and Secular: Religion and Politics Worldwide. Cambridge University Press, New York.
Palani, P. (2008). The effect of religiosity on income inequality. Journal of Politics and International Affairs, 61–70.
Paldam, M., & Gundlach, E. (2013) The religious transition. A long-run perspective. Public Choice 156, 105–123 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-012-9934-z
Park, J., Kim, Y., & Heo, S. (2017). Dual-index measurement of income inequality. Bulletin of Economic Research, 70(3), 277–284. doi:10.1111/boer.12141
Rees, T.J. (2009). Is personal insecurity a cause of cross-national differences in the intensity of religious belief? Journal of Religion and Society 11, 1–17.
Rieger, J. (2013). The Ethics of Wealth in a World of Economic Inequality: A Christian Perspective in a Buddhist-Christian Dialogue. Buddhist-Christian Studies, 33, 153-162.
Rupasingha, A., & Chilton, B. (2009). Religious Adherence and County Economic Growth in the US. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 72, 438–450. doi:10.1016/j. jebo.2009.05.020.
Solt, F., Habel, P., & Grant, J. T. (2011). Economic inequality, relative power, and religiosity. Social Science Quarterly, 92(2), 447–465. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6237.2011.00777.x.
Storm, I. (2017). Does economic insecurity predict religiosity? Evidence from the European Social Survey 2002–2014. Sociology of Religion, 78(2), 146–172. doi:10.1093/socrel/srw055
Wang, Q., & Lin, X. (2014). Does religious beliefs affect economic growth? Evidence from provincial-level panel data in China, China Economic Review 31, 277–287.
Weithman, P. (2019). Religious Ethics and Economic Inequality. Journal of Religious Ethics, 47(2), 223–231. doi:10.1111/jore.12265
Wells, R. (2006). Education’s effect on income inequality: an economic globalisation perspective. Globalisation, Societies and Education, 4(3), 371–391. doi:10.1080/14767720600955428.
Winkler, H. (2019). The effect of income inequality on political polarization: Evidence from European regions, 2002-2014. Economics & Politics. doi:10.1111/ecpo.12129.
Published
2021-12-31
How to Cite
Amri, Khairul, and A. Rahmat Adi. 2021. “APAKAH RELIGIUSITAS KEISLAMAN MEMPENGARUHI KETIMPANGAN PENDAPATAN? BUKTI DATA PANEL DARI PROVINSI ACEH”. Jurnal Ekonomi Dan Pembangunan 29 (2), 147-66. https://doi.org/10.14203/JEP.29.2.2021.147-166.
Issue
Vol. 29 No. 2 (2021)
Section
Article

Copyright (c) 2021 Jurnal Ekonomi dan Pembangunan

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Terms and Conditions of Publication


1. Author's Rights and Authorities

As an author, you (or your employer or institution) may do the following:

  • make copies (print or electronic) of the article for your own personal use (not for commercial purpose), including for your own classroom teaching use;

  • make copies and distribute such copies (including through email) of the article to research colleagues, but not allowed to distribute commercially and systematically, e.g. via an email list or list server;

  • present the article at a meeting or conference and to distribute copies of the article to the delegates attending such meeting;

  • retain all proprietary rights in any process, procedure, or article of manufacture described in the work;

  • include the article in full or in part in a thesis or dissertation;

  • use the article or any part thereof in a printed compilation of your works, such as collected writings or lecture notes, and other derivative works, with full acknowledgement to JEP as the original journal publishing the article;

  • may reproduce material extracted from the article or derivative works for the author's personal use, but must consider the copyrights procedure.

All copies, print or electronic, or other use of the paper or article must include the appropriate bibliographic citation for the article’s publication in the journal.

 

2. Requests from Third Parties

Although authors are permitted to re-use all or portions of the article in other works, this does not include granting third-party requests for reprinting, republishing, or other types of re-use. Requests for all uses not included above, including the authorization of third parties to reproduce or otherwise use all or part of the article (including figures and tables), should be referred to P2E-LIPI by going to our website at http://ekonomi.lipi.go.id/.

 

3. P2E LIPI Copyright Ownership

Economic Research Center, the Indonesian Institute of Sciences (P2E-LIPI) owns the copyrights to reproduce, distribute, disseminate, translate, and other uses in accordance with the existing Laws and Regulations.

 

Every accepted manuscript should be accompanied by "Copyright Transfer Agreement" prior to the article publication.


Lisensi Creative Commons
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

 

JEP Journal by P2E-LIPI is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. Permissions beyond the scope of this license may be available at http://jurnalekonomi.lipi.go.id/index.php/JEP

If you are a nonprofit or charitable organization, your use of an NC-licensed work could still run afoul of the NC restriction, and if you are a for-profit entity, your use of an NC-licensed work does not necessarily mean you have violated the term.