Has Political Decentralisation Brought Progressive Institutional Changes to Indonesia?*

  • Ivantia Mokoginta Faculty of Economics Department of Economics and Development Studies Parahyangan Catholic University
Keywords: social capital, Veblenian institutional economics

Abstract

Political decentralisation in Indonesia has not necessarily brought progressive institutional changes leading to a more democratic society at the local level. When social capital is embedded in the ceremonially warranted patterns of behaviour, that is, patrimonial behaviour, the increase in social capital is restricted to the business-bureaucrat-politico networks -- the local political oligarchies. As a result, the increase in social capital at the local level is likely to be wasted by rent collecting. This is the reason progressive institutional changes remain far from complete, at least in the medium term. This paper also shows what could be done and what has been accomplished to push forward progressive institutional changes

References

Badan Pusat Statistik. (2012). Jumlah penduduk miskin, persentase penduduk miskin dan garis kemiskinan, 1970–2013. Retrieved February 8, 2014, from http://www.bps.go.id/tab_sub/view.php?kat=1&tabel1=1&daftar=1&id_subyek=23&notab=7.

Boediono. (2008). Dimensi ekonomi-politik pembangunan Indonesia. Jurnal Keuangan Publik, 5(1), 1–17.

Brennan, G., & Hamlin, A. (1998). Expressive voting and electoral equilibrium. Public Choice, Volume 95, Issue 1, pp 149–175.

Buehler, M. (2009). The rising importance of personal networks in Indonesian local politics: An analysis of districit government head elections in South Sulawesi in 2005. In M. Erb and P. Sulistiyanto (eds). Deepening democracy in Indonesia? Direct elections for local leaders (pilkada). Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies.

Bush, P.D. (1983). An exploration of the structural characteristics of a Veblen-Ayres Foster defined institutional domain. Journal of Economic Issues, XVII(1), 35–66.

Bush, P.D. (1989). The concept of ‘progressive’ institutional change and its implications for economic policy formation’. Journal of Economic Issues, XXIII(2), 455–464.

Coleman, J.S. (1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology, 94 (Supplement), S95–S120.

Cribb, R. (2011). A system of exemptions: Historicizing state illegality in Indonesia. In E. Aspinall and G. van Klinken. The state and illegality in Indonesia. Leiden: KITLV Press.

Crouch, H. (1979). Patrimonialism and military rule in Indonesia. World Politics, 31(4), 571–587.

Evaquarta, R. (2010). Corrupting politics. Inside Indonesia, Jan-March. Retrieved Mar 17, 2010, from Inside Indonesia, http://www.insideindonesia.org.

Fesler, J.W. (1968). Centralization and decentralization. In D.L. Sills (ed.). International encyclopedia of the social sciences. Volume 2. New York: Macmillan.

Foster, F.J. (1981). The fundamental principles of economics. Journal of Economic Issues, XV(4), 937–942.

Field, J. (2008). From metaphor to concept. In J. Field. Social capital (pp. 13–47). New York: Routledge.

Hadiz, V. (2001). Capitalism, oligarchic power and the state in Indonesia. Historical materialism, 8(1), 119–152.

Hadiz, V. & Robison, R. (2005). Neo-liberal reforms and illiberal consolidations: The Indonesian paradox’. Journal of Development Studies, 41(2), 220–241.

Hamid, S. (2014, January 22). Indonesia’s election activists fight to end money politics. Retrieved February 7, 2014, from Asia Foundation. http://asiafoundation.org/in-asia/2014/01/22/indonesias-election-activists-fight-to-end-money-politics/

Hansen, G.E. (1972). Indonesian’s green revolution: The abandonment of a non-market strategy toward change. Asian Survey, 12(11), 932–946.

Hidayat, S. (2009). Pilkada, money politics and the dangers of ‘informal governance’ practices’. In M. Erb and P. Sulistiyanto (eds). Deepening democracy in Indonesia? Direct elections for local leaders (pilkada). Singapore: Institute of South Asian Studies.

International Monetary Fund. (1997, October 31). International Monetary Fund Organization. Retrieved June 19, 2012 from Indonesia Letter of Intent. http://www.imf.org/external/np/loi/103197.htm.

Jakarta Globe. (2013, September 23 ). New generation of local leaders cleaning house. Retrieved February 7, 2014, from Jakarta Globe http://www.thejakartaglobe.com/news/new-generation-of-local-leaders-cleaning-house/.

Jottier, D. & Heyndels, B. (2010). Does social capital increase political accountability? An empirical test for Flemish municipalities. Public Choice, 150, 731-744. Retrieved November 12, 2010, from Public Choice. http://www.springerlink.com.ezproxy.flinders.edu.au/content/128qg22309x8x40q/fulltext.pdf.

Kingsbury, D. (2005). Traditional and colonial influence. In D. Kingsbury. The politics of Indonesia (3rd edn). Melbourne: Oxford University Press.

Kittilson, M.C. & Dalton, R.J. (2011). Virtual civil society: the new frontier of social capital? Political Behaviour, 33(4). doi: 10.1007/s11109-010-9143-8.

Koentjaraningrat. (1974). Kebudayaan, mentalitas dan pembangunan. Jakarta: Gramedia.

Mann, T. (2012). Jakarta governor’s race goes online, with mixed results for Indonesia’s democracy. Retrieved February 7, 2014, from Asia Foundation. http://asiafoundation.org/in-asia/2012/09/19/jakarta-governors-race-goes-online-with-mixed-results-for-indonesias-democracy/.

McLeod, R. (2000). Soeharto’s Indonesia: A better class of corruption. Agenda, 7(2): 99–112.

Morrison, T.H. (2004). What is regionalism? What is decentralisation?. Unpublished. Lecture Notes in the topic regionalism, decentralisation and governance (POAD 9116) at the Flinders University of South Australia, Bedford Park, on July 26, 2004.

North, D.C. (1991). Institutions. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 5(1), 97–112.

O’Hara, P.A. (1997). A new measure of macroeconomic performance and institutional change: The index of community, warranted knowledge, and participation. Journal of Economic Issues, 31(1), 103–127.

Praktikno. (2009). Political parties in pilkada: Some problems for democratic consolidation. In M. Erb and P. Sulistiyanto (eds). Deepening democracy in Indonesia? Direct elections for local leaders (pilkada). Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies.

Putnam, R.D. (1993). Social capital and institutional success. In R.D. Putnam, R. Leonardi, & R. Y. Nanetti (eds). Making democracy work: Civic traditions in modern Italy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Putzel, J. (1997). Accounting for the ‘dark sideâ€â€™ of social capital: Reading Robert Putnam on democracy’. Journal of International Development, 9(7), 939–949.

Renoe, C.E. (2002). Institutionalized ‘corruption’: Implications for legal reform in Indonesia and the need to make haste slowly. Stanford Journal of East Asian Affairs, 2(Spring), 102–113.

Resosudarmo, B.P. & Yamazaki, S. (2011). Training and visit (T&V) extension vs. farmer field school: The Indonesian experience. Working Papers in Trade and Development 2011/01. Canberra: Arndt-Corden Department of Economics, Crawford School of Economics and Government, Australian National University.

Roth, G. (1968). Personal rulership, patrimonialism, and empire-building in the new states. World politics, 20(2), 194–206.

Simon, H. (1972). Theories of bounded rationality. In C.B .McGuire & R. Radner (eds). Decision and organization. Amsterdam: North-Holland.

Smith, B. (2002). Decentralisation. In C. Kirkpatrick, R. Clarke & C. Polidano (eds.), Handbook on development policy and management. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

Smith, C.Q. (2009). The return of the sultan? Power, patronage, and political machines in ‘post’-conflict North Maluku. In M. Erb and P. Sulistiyanto (eds). Deepening democracy in Indonesia? Direct elections for local leaders (pilkada). Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies.

Subianto, B. (2009). Ethnic politics and the rise of the Dayak-bureaucrats in local elections: Pilkada in six kabupaten in West Kalimantan’. In M. Erb and P. Sulistiyanto (eds). Deepening democracy in Indonesia? Direct elections for local leaders (pilkada). Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies.

Tidey, S. (2012). New rules, new forms of corruption. Inside Indonesia, 108. Retrieved May 17, 2012 from Inside Indonesia. http://www.insideindonesia.org/edition-108-apr-jun-2012/new-rules-new-forms-of-corruption-02042900.

UNDP. (2013). Human development report 2013. The rise of the south: human progress in a diverse world. New York: United Nations Development Programme.

Welzel, C. & Inglehart, R. (2001). Human development and the ‘explosion’of democracy: Variations of regime change across 60 societies. Discussion Paper FS III-202. Berlin: Wissenschaftszentrum Berlin fur Sozialforschung.

Wijaya, M.A. (2013). Peran pemuda akan menentukan di Pemilu 2014. Retrieved February 7, 2014, from Republika Online. http://www.republika.co.id/berita/nasional/politik/13/12/11/mxn109-peran-pemuda-akan-menentukan-di-pemilu-2014.

World Bank. (2014a). GDP growth (annual %). Retrieved February 1, 2014, from Data. http://data.worldbank.org/indicator/NY.GDP.MKTP.KD.ZG.

World Bank. (2014b). Population growth (annual %). Retrieved February 1, 2014, from Data. http://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SP.POP.GROW.

Published
2013-07-31
Section
Article