THE IMPACT OF THE INDONESIAN TAX ADMINISTRATION REFORM ON TAX COMPLIANCE AND TAX REVENUE
This study investigated the impact of the Indonesian tax administration reform on tax compliance and tax revenue. I used merged provincial-level data obtained from two main sources: Directorate General of Taxes (DGT) and Indonesia Statistic, and I applied multiple regressions with a fixed-effect model. I find that individual taxpayer compliance was positively affected by the tax administration reform. Tax revenue, however, was negatively affected by the tax administration reform due to DGTâ€™s productivity problem meaning that tax potency variables did not affect tax revenue after the tax administration reform was completed. The findings identify several areas for improvements and suggest several policy implications. First, improving administration in Small Taxpayer Office (STO) especially for individual taxpayers is needed. Second, tax revenue strategy focusing on individual taxpayers is needed to materialize improvement in individual taxpayer compliance into tax revenue. Third, problem in productivity suggests that DGT should improve its input side by improving law enforcement, widening delegated authority, and increasing budget allocation.
Andreoni, J., Erard, B., & Feinstein, J. (1998). Tax compliance. Journal of Economic Literature, 36, 818-860.
Bergman, M.S. (2003). Tax Reforms and tax compliance: The divergent paths of Chile and Argentina. Journal of Latin American Studies, 35, 593-624.
Bird, R.M. (2004). Administrative dimensions of tax reform. Asia Pacific Tax Bulletin, 10(3), 134-150.
Bird, R.M., Vazquez,J.M., & Torgler, B. (2004). Societal institutions and tax effort in developing countries (International Studies Program Working Paper 04-06). Retrieved November 10, 2013 from http://aysps.gsu.edu/isp/files/ISP_CONFERENCES_TAX_REFORM_MARTINEZ_BIRD_TORGLER_PAPER.pdf
Brondolo, J., Silvani, C., Borgne, E.L., & Bosch, F. (2008). Tax administration reform and fiscal adjustment: The case of Indonesia (2001-07) (IMF Working Paper 08/129). Washington DC: IMF. Retrieved January 1, 2014 from http://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/wp/2008/wp08129.pdf
Crandall, W., & Bodin, J. (2005). Revenue administration reform in Middle Eastern countries, 1994-2004 (IMF Working Paper 05/203). Washington DC: IMF. Retrieved January 1, 2014 from https://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/wp/2005/wp05203.pdf
Das-Gupta, A., Ghosh, S., & Mookherjee, D. (2004). Tax administration reform and taxpayer compliance in India. International Tax and Public Finance, 11, 575-600.
Gupta, A.S. (2007). Determinants of tax revenue efforts in developing countries (IMF Working Paper 07/184). Washington DC: IMF. Retrieved November 10, 2013 from http://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/wp/2007/wp07184.pdf
Jatmiko, B.P. (2014, March 7). Potensi pajak Rp150 triliun hilang [150 trillion tax potency disappeared]. Kompas. Retrieved May 11, 2014 from http://bisniskeuangan.kompas.com/read/2014/03/07/0801236/Potensi.Pajak.Rp.150.Triliun.Hilang
Kloeden, D. (2011). Revenue administration reforms in Anglophone Africa since the early 1990s (IMF Working Paper 11/162). Washington DC: IMF. Retrieved January 1, 2014 from http://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/wp/2011/wp11162.pdf
Law of The Republic of Indonesia Number 28 Year 2007 Concerning The Third Amendment of Law Number 6 Year 1983 about General Provisions and Tax Procedures Law (2007) (in Indonesian). Retrieved November 1, 2013 from http://pajak.go.id/dmdocuments/UU-28-2007.pdf
Law of The Republic of Indonesia Number 36 Year 2008 Concerning The Fourth Amendment of Law Number 7 Year 1983 about Income Tax (2008) (in Indonesian). Retrieved November 1, 2013 from http://www.pajak.go.id/dmdocuments/UU-36-2008.pdf
Le, T.M., Dodson, B.M., & Bayraktar, N. (2012). Tax capacity and tax effort: extended cross-country analysis from 1994-2009 (The World Bank Policy Research Working Paper 6252). Retrieved December 7, 2013 from http://elibrary.worldbank.org/doi/pdf/10.1596/1813-9450-6252
Made. (2010, February 22). Ditjen pajak butuh 18.000 pegawai baru [The Directorate General of Taxes needs 18,000 new employees]. Kompas. Retrieved May 11, 2014, from http://nasional.kompas.com/read/2010/02/22/17233661/Ditjen.Pajak.Butuh.18.000.Pegawai.Baru
Manggiasih, B. (2009, March 18). Menteri Sri Mulyani: Reformasi pajak berhasil [Finance Minister Sri Mulyani: Tax reform was successful]. Tempo. Retrieved April 13, 2014, from http://www.tempo.co/read/news/2009/03/18/087165384/Menteri-Sri-Mulyanii-Reformasi-Pajak-Berhasil
Mazur, M.J., & Plumley, A.H. (2007). Understanding the tax gap. National Tax Journal, LX(3), 569.576.
Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. (2004). Compliance risk management: Managing and improving tax compliance. Paris: OECD Publishing. Retrieved March 18, 2014 from http://www.oecd.org/site/ctpfta/37212610.pdf
Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. (2010). Tax administration in OECD and selected non-OECD countries: Comparative information series. Paris: OECD Publishing. Retrieved May 1, 2014 from http://www.oecd.org/ctp/administration/CIS-2010.pdf
Piancastelli, M. (2001). Measuring the tax effort of developed and developing countries: Cross country panel data analysis, 1985/95 (IPEA Working Paper No. 818). Retrieved November 10, 2013 from http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=283758
Rizal, Y. (2011). Lessons from Indonesian tax administration reform phase 1 (2001-2008): Does good governance matter? In H. Kimura, Suharko, A. B. Javier, A. Tangsupvattana (Eds.), Limits of good governance in developing countries (pp. 414-462). Yogyakarta: Gadjah Mada University Press.
Silvani, C., & Baer, K. (1997). Designing a tax administration reform strategy: Experiences and guidelines (IMF Working Paper 97/30). Washington DC: IMF. Retrieved January 1, 2014 from http://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/wp/wp9730.pdf
Stotsky, J.G., & WoldeMariam, A. (1997). Tax effort in sub-saharan Africa (IMF Working Paper WP/97/107). Retrieved December 7, 2013 from http://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/wp/wp97107.pdf
Tanzi, V., & Pellechio, A. (1995). The reform of Tax Administration (IMF Working Paper 95/22). Washington DC: IMF.
Teera, J.M. & Hudson, J. (2004). Tax performance: A comparative study. Journal of International Development, 16, 785-802.
The Directorate General of Taxes. (2007). Annual report 2007 (in Indonesian). Jakarta: DGT
Vehorn, C.L. (2011). Fiscal adjustment in developing countries through tax administration reform. Journal of Developing Areas, 45(1), 323-338.
Copyright (c) 2019 Jurnal Ekonomi dan Pembangunan
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Terms and Conditions of Publication
1. Author's Rights and Authorities
As an author, you (or your employer or institution) may do the following:
make copies (print or electronic) of the article for your own personal use (not for commercial purpose), including for your own classroom teaching use;
make copies and distribute such copies (including through email) of the article to research colleagues, but not allowed to distribute commercially and systematically, e.g. via an email list or list server;
present the article at a meeting or conference and to distribute copies of the article to the delegates attending such meeting;
retain all proprietary rights in any process, procedure, or article of manufacture described in the work;
include the article in full or in part in a thesis or dissertation;
use the article or any part thereof in a printed compilation of your works, such as collected writings or lecture notes, and other derivative works, with full acknowledgement to JEP as the original journal publishing the article;
may reproduce material extracted from the article or derivative works for the author's personal use, but must consider the copyrights procedure.
All copies, print or electronic, or other use of the paper or article must include the appropriate bibliographic citation for the article’s publication in the journal.
2. Requests from Third Parties
Although authors are permitted to re-use all or portions of the article in other works, this does not include granting third-party requests for reprinting, republishing, or other types of re-use. Requests for all uses not included above, including the authorization of third parties to reproduce or otherwise use all or part of the article (including figures and tables), should be referred to P2E-LIPI by going to our website at http://ekonomi.lipi.go.id/.
3. P2E LIPI Copyright Ownership
Economic Research Center, the Indonesian Institute of Sciences (P2E-LIPI) owns the copyrights to reproduce, distribute, disseminate, translate, and other uses in accordance with the existing Laws and Regulations.
Every accepted manuscript should be accompanied by "Copyright Transfer Agreement" prior to the article publication.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
JEP Journal by P2E-LIPI is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. Permissions beyond the scope of this license may be available at http://jurnalekonomi.lipi.go.id/index.php/JEP
If you are a nonprofit or charitable organization, your use of an NC-licensed work could still run afoul of the NC restriction, and if you are a for-profit entity, your use of an NC-licensed work does not necessarily mean you have violated the term.